Data Governance Under Pressure: Navigating Tariffs, EU Regulations, and Security in 2025

Organizations worldwide face unprecedented governance challenges as EU data regulations expand and tariff-driven supply chain disruptions create new cybersecurity vulnerabilities. With penalties reaching up to €20 million or 4% of annual global turnover for serious violations under GDPR, the financial stakes couldn’t be higher (European Commission). This article examines how these converging forces impact digital communications governance and explores unified approaches that transform compliance challenges into strategic advantages.

Expanding EU Regulatory Landscape in 2025

Organizations managing digital communications face a rapidly evolving regulatory environment in Europe. New frameworks build upon GDPR’s foundation, creating a complex matrix of requirements affecting email communications, file sharing, and managed file transfer solutions.

September 2025 Data Act Deadline: What Organizations Need to Know

The EU Data Act becomes applicable on September 12, 2025—a critical deadline with far-reaching implications for data management. Unlike previous regulations focusing primarily on personal data, the Data Act encompasses both personal and non-personal data, creating new obligations for data access, sharing, and portability.

Organizations must prepare for significant changes, including requirements to provide users access to data generated by connected products and allowing them to share this data with third parties. According to TrustArc research, these requirements will fundamentally transform how organizations approach data sharing across communication channels, with implementation costs expected to be substantial for unprepared businesses.

The Act’s requirements extend beyond IoT devices to affect virtually all digital communications, creating new compliance challenges for email systems, file sharing platforms, and managed file transfer solutions. A 2024 Kiteworks survey found that 57% of organizations cannot effectively track sensitive data exchanged with external parties—a compliance blind spot that creates severe exposure under the Data Act’s requirements.

Beyond GDPR: How the Regulatory Matrix Creates New Governance Challenges

The Data Act represents just one piece of Europe’s expanding regulatory framework. Organizations must simultaneously navigate:

• The NIS2 Directive, which introduces stringent cybersecurity requirements for essential entities across sectors like energy, healthcare, and transport
• The Digital Markets Act (DMA), fully enforceable in 2025, bringing sweeping changes to online platforms with interoperability mandates and restrictions on data combination across services
• The AI Act, which introduces requirements for data used in AI systems

This regulatory matrix creates unprecedented complexity. According to a MeriTalk report, 70% of organizations now juggle at least six regulatory frameworks, making unified data governance critical. Each regulation brings distinct requirements for audit logging, access controls, and data transfer limitations, creating significant operational challenges for security teams.

Brussels Effect: How EU Regulations Are Setting Global Standards

The impact of EU data regulations extends far beyond European borders. GDPR’s extraterritorial scope has effectively elevated it to a global standard, influencing data protection legislation worldwide. Organizations targeting EU residents must comply with its provisions regardless of headquarters location.

This “Brussels Effect” has inspired similar legislation in over 120 countries, demonstrating the EU’s far-reaching impact on international data privacy norms (IAPP Global Privacy Resource). For multinational organizations, maintaining separate governance systems for different regions becomes prohibitively complex, effectively making European standards the de facto global requirements.

How Tariffs Create Hidden Data Governance Risks

While regulatory compliance already presents significant challenges, tariff-driven supply chain disruptions introduce additional governance complications that many organizations overlook.

Supply Chain Disruption and New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

Tariffs force organizations to shift suppliers, relocate production, or onboard new partners—especially when tariffs target critical technologies or IT infrastructure. Each transition introduces new digital interfaces and potential vulnerabilities, expanding the attack surface and complicating data governance.

Research from SoCRadar indicates these transitions often lead to inconsistent security protocols, fragmented data flows, and increased third-party risks—all of which cybercriminals quickly exploit. With 57% of organizations unable to effectively track sensitive data exchanged with external parties, these supply chain shifts create perfect conditions for data breaches.

The operational impact is substantial. Security teams must rapidly assess new partner security controls, integrate different systems, and maintain compliance across an increasingly fragmented ecosystem—all while maintaining business continuity.

Crypto-Tariffs: How Data Localization Requirements Fragment Governance

Regulations like GDPR act as de facto trade barriers—what experts call “crypto-tariffs”—by imposing costly data localization and compliance requirements. These requirements segregate data, increase storage and processing costs, and complicate cross-border data flows.

Organizations with global operations face conflicting localization rules across regions, forcing them to maintain separate systems or implement complex data routing mechanisms. This fragmentation significantly increases compliance costs. According to a Mercatus Center study, data localization requirements effectively function as non-tariff trade barriers, increasing operational costs by 30-60% for affected organizations.

Financial Strain and Security Trade-offs

Tariffs raise technology costs while simultaneously squeezing budgets, putting pressure on cybersecurity investments precisely when they’re most needed. A Global Trade Magazine survey found that 61% of breaches stem from third-party vulnerabilities, with smaller supply chain partners particularly affected by tariff-induced budget constraints.

This creates a dangerous dynamic—organizations face expanding attack surfaces from supply chain shifts while having fewer resources to address new vulnerabilities. The result is often security shortcuts, delayed upgrades, or inconsistent controls across environments.

Communication Governance Challenge: Email, File Sharing, and Managed File Transfer

Digital communication channels present unique governance challenges under expanding regulatory requirements and tariff pressures, requiring specialized approaches for each medium.

Email Protection in a Fragmented Regulatory Environment

Email remains a primary business communication channel and a significant attack vector. GDPR and the upcoming Data Act impose strict requirements on how personal data in emails is handled, stored, and secured.

Organizations must implement comprehensive email protection mechanisms, including encryption, access controls, and robust audit logs. The Verizon Data Breach Investigation Report found that 94% of malware is delivered via email, making this channel particularly vulnerable when supply chain shifts introduce new communication partners and protocols.

Secure File Sharing and Collaboration Under the Data Act

File sharing and collaboration platforms face particularly complex challenges under the Data Act’s requirements for data portability. Organizations must balance accessibility with security, ensuring users can access and share files while maintaining appropriate protections.

The financial impact is substantial—62% of organizations invest over 2,000 staff hours annually just compiling compliance audit reports across disparate systems, according to a Kiteworks study. This operational burden becomes even heavier when tariff-driven supplier changes require rapid onboarding of new collaboration partners.

Managed File Transfer and Cross-Border Data Flows

Managed file transfer systems must address increasingly complex requirements for secure transmission across organizational boundaries. With conflicting data localization rules, MFT solutions must implement geography-aware controls that adapt to regional requirements.

Organizations using MFT solutions face particular challenges balancing the “right to be forgotten” requirements with audit trail mandates. According to an Axiom report, this paradox creates significant implementation difficulties, with many organizations struggling to implement technical solutions that satisfy both requirements.

Privacy by Design: Implementing Seven Core Principles

Privacy by Design represents a fundamental shift in how organizations approach data protection, requiring privacy safeguards embedded into system architecture rather than added as afterthoughts.

From Proactive to Reactive: Building Security Into Systems

Organizations implementing Privacy by Design principles proactively anticipate and prevent privacy risks before they occur. This approach requires embedding privacy protections into the fabric of technology, products, and services from the outset.

The seven core principles provide a comprehensive framework, beginning with proactive rather than reactive measures and ensuring privacy protections are built as default settings. Organizations successfully implementing these principles report significantly lower breach rates—a SecurePrivacy study found organizations with mature Privacy by Design programs experienced 48% fewer reportable incidents.

Data Minimization and Purpose Limitation Across Communication Channels

European regulations emphasize collecting only the minimum personal data necessary for specific, documented purposes. This principle requires organizations to critically evaluate what data they actually need, rather than gathering information indiscriminately.

Implementing data minimization across email, file sharing, and managed file transfer presents unique challenges. Organizations must define specific purposes for data collection in each channel and implement technical controls preventing use beyond these purposes. An Alation study found that effective data minimization strategies reduce breach risk by up to 35% by limiting the scope of potentially exposed information.

Private Data Network Approach: A Unified Governance Solution

Addressing the convergence of regulatory requirements and tariff-driven disruptions requires a unified governance approach that provides consistent controls across communication channels.

Consolidating Communication Channels Under Unified Governance

The Private Data Network approach consolidates email protection, secure file sharing, managed file transfer, SFTP, and web forms under unified governance. This consolidation creates centralized visibility and consistent controls across all communication channels.

This approach delivers significant operational benefits. A Kiteworks study found that organizations implementing unified governance frameworks reduced compliance reporting time by 68% by eliminating redundant efforts across siloed systems. The single-pane visibility also improves security effectiveness, with consolidated platforms detecting cross-channel threats that siloed solutions miss.

Addressing Right to Be Forgotten vs. Audit Requirements Paradox

One of the most challenging aspects of European data regulation compliance involves balancing individuals’ “right to be forgotten” with audit trail mandates. Organizations must develop approaches respecting individuals’ rights to have their data deleted while maintaining sufficient records for compliance demonstration.

The Private Data Network approach addresses this challenge through granular data classification and policy-based retention. Technical solutions enable automatically applying appropriate retention policies based on data type and regulatory requirements. According to an Axiom survey, 78% of organizations struggle with this balance, making automated solutions increasingly critical.

Deployment Flexibility for Data Localization Requirements

With global operations come complex data residency obligations. The Private Data Network approach enables configuring geographic storage restrictions for certain data types, ensuring compliance with requirements like GDPR’s cross-border transfer limitations or data sovereignty laws.

This flexibility becomes increasingly valuable as tariff pressures drive organizational restructuring. A Kiteworks study found that 43% of organizations have implemented regionalized deployment models to address conflicting data localization requirements, with significant cost savings compared to maintaining entirely separate systems.

Strategic Business Benefits Beyond Compliance

While regulatory compliance drives many governance initiatives, forward-thinking organizations recognize the strategic benefits that extend beyond avoiding penalties.

Transforming Regulatory Burden into Competitive Advantage

Organizations implementing unified governance frameworks don’t just achieve compliance—they create operational efficiencies, enhance security postures, and build stronger relationships with privacy-conscious customers.

Customer trust represents a particularly significant advantage. A TrustArc study found that organizations demonstrating strong data governance practices saw 35% higher customer trust scores, translating directly into business metrics like customer retention and willingness to share data for personalization.

Supply Chain Resilience Through Consistent Controls

A unified governance approach creates significant advantages when navigating tariff-driven supply chain changes. Organizations can quickly onboard new suppliers or relocate production while maintaining consistent data security controls.

This resilience delivers tangible business benefits, including 42% faster partner onboarding times and 57% fewer security incidents during transitions, according to a SoCRadar analysis. When tariffs force rapid supplier changes, this adaptability becomes a critical competitive advantage.

Moving Forward: Integrating Governance Into Business Strategy

Organizations facing the convergence of EU regulations and tariff-driven disruptions should adopt strategic approaches rather than treating compliance as a checkbox exercise.

Begin by conducting comprehensive data mapping across all communication channels, identifying where sensitive information resides and how it flows. This visibility provides the foundation for implementing appropriate controls and addressing the specific requirements of each regulation.

Next, assess your current governance structure, identifying silos that create compliance blind spots or operational inefficiencies. Consider how unified governance frameworks might streamline operations while enhancing security and compliance posture.

Finally, recognize that governance extends beyond technology to encompass people and processes. Develop training programs ensuring all employees understand their role in maintaining data security and regulatory compliance.

By approaching governance strategically, organizations transform what many view as regulatory burdens into sources of competitive advantage, operational efficiency, and customer trust—creating resilience in an increasingly complex regulatory and trade environment.

Frequently Asked Questions